| Ryan v City of New York |
| 2009 NY Slip Op 09521 [68 AD3d 613] |
| December 22, 2009 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| Ronald Ryan et al., Plaintiffs, v City of New York, Defendant, New York Daily News Company et al., Respondents, and Ryder Truck Rental, Appellant. |
—[*1]
Mauro Goldberg & Lilling LLP, Great Neck (Katherine Herr Solomon of counsel), for
respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Larry S. Schachner, J.), entered February 26, 2009, which denied defendant Ryder Truck Rental's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Ryder established prima facie that the problems with the brakes on the truck it maintained were unanticipated and that it exercised reasonable care to keep the brakes in good working order (see Normoyle v New York City Tr. Auth., 181 AD2d 498 [1992]). However, defendant Daily News, the owner of the truck, submitted evidence sufficient to raise issues of fact whether the brakes were defective and not properly maintained. Defendant Steven Grand, the driver of the truck, testified that the brakes on the truck failed. A police officer who responded to the accident observed a maladjustment on the slack adjuster, a mechanism that controlled the brake, and an oil leak on the hub of the truck. An expert retained by Daily News opined that the maladjustment and the oil leak could lead to brake failure and were indicative of improper maintenance or inspection of the truck. Although the expert did not inspect the truck, his opinions were [*2]sufficiently supported by photographs of the scene and the firsthand observations of the police officer. Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Sweeny, Freedman and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.