Discovision Assoc. v Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.
2010 NY Slip Op 01437 [70 AD3d 526]
February 18, 2010
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, March 31, 2010


Discovision Associates, Plaintiff,
v
Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd., et al., Defendants. Fujifilm Corporation, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v Prodisc Technology, Inc., Third-Party Defendant, and Ritek Corporation et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.

—[*1] Hogan & Hartson, LLP, New York (Eric J. Lobenfeld of counsel), for appellant.

Allegaert Berger & Vogel LLP, New York (Cornelius P. McCarthy of counsel), for respondents.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered August 19, 2008, and said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties; and due deliberation having been had thereon, it is unanimously ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed for the reasons stated by Herman Cahn, J., with costs and disbursements. Concur—Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Nardelli and Freedman, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2008 NY Slip Op 31697(U).]