Perez v City of New York
2010 NY Slip Op 05477 [74 AD3d 638]
June 22, 2010
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, August 25, 2010


Jaime Perez, an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, Nancy Torres, et al., Appellants,
v
City of New York, Respondent.

[*1] Arnold E. DiJoseph, P.C., New York (Arnold E. DiJoseph, III of counsel), for appellants.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Drake A. Colley of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Larry S. Schachner, J.), entered April 20, 2009, which, in an action for personal injuries against the City of New York, denied plaintiffs' motion to restore the action to active status and for leave to amend the summons and complaint so as to substitute the New York City Department of Education as the only defendant, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court correctly held that it was without jurisdiction to entertain the motion when the action had already been dismissed by order of this Court precisely because plaintiff sued the City instead of the Department (41 AD3d 378 [2007], lv denied 10 NY3d 708 [2008]). In any event, we reject plaintiff's present argument that the circumstances, including the naming of the Department as well the City in the notice of claim, show that the naming of only the City in the summons was a nonprejudicial misnomer that is correctable under CPLR 305 (c). Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Andrias, Catterson, Renwick and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.