| Matter of Emma v Collini |
| 2010 NY Slip Op 06583 [76 AD3d 975] |
| September 14, 2010 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| In the Matter of Salvatore Emma, Petitioner, v Robert J. Collini, Respondent. Daniel J. Donovan, Jr., Nonparty. |
—[*1]
Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Roberta L. Martin of counsel), for
respondent.
Daniel M. Donovan, Jr., District Attorney, Staten Island, N.Y. (Morrie I. Kleinbart of
counsel), nonparty pro se.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent
Robert J. Collini, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, to vacate an order of
protection dated June 11, 2010, and entered in an underlying criminal action entitled People v
Emma, prosecuted in that court under indictment No. 345/09, and application by the
petitioner for poor person relief.
Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee
imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,
Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without
costs or disbursements.
The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a
ministerial act, and only where there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter
of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12, 16 [1981]). The petitioner has
failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. The propriety an order of protection
issued against the petitioner during a sentencing proceeding could have been raised on a direct
appeal from the judgment of conviction (see People v Nieves, 2 NY3d 310, 312 [2004]). Mastro, J.P., Santucci,
Angiolillo and Chambers, JJ., concur.