Gross v Grossman
2010 NY Slip Op 06778 [76 AD3d 1048]
September 28, 2010
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, October 27, 2010


Jeffrey Gross, Appellant,
v
Susan Grossman, Respondent.

[*1] Howard Benjamin, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Segal & Greenberg, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Philip C. Segal of counsel), for respondent.

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Panepinto, J.), entered March 30, 2009, which denied his motion for pendente lite relief.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the Supreme Court correctly concluded that the parties' "Marital Separation and Property Settlement Agreement" was properly acknowledged (see Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [3]; Weinstein v Weinstein, 36 AD3d 797, 798 [2007]). Accordingly, the plaintiff's motion for pendente lite relief was properly denied (see Klein v Klein, 246 AD2d 195, 198 [1998]). Dillon, J.P., Florio, Leventhal and Chambers, JJ., concur.