Defendant appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Lizbeth Gonzalez, J.), entered June 30, 2009, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Per Curiam.

Order (Lizbeth Gonzalez, J.), entered June 30, 2009, reversed, without costs, and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.
In opposition to defendant's prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the ground that plaintiff did not submit timely proof of its claim for first-party no-fault benefits (see 11 NYCRR 65-1.1; 65-2.4), plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue with respect to whether it had a "reasonable justification" for its delay in submitting such proof (see 11 NYCRR 65-3.3[e]). Plaintiff's bald and unelaborated assertion that the delay was attributable to a staffing issue, i.e., the absence of an (unidentified) employee responsible for preparing claims because of "a family emergency," is, under the circumstances presented, insufficient to raise a triable issue (see generally Bronx Expert Radiology, P.C. v Motor Vehicle Acc. Indem. Corp., 20 Misc 3d 140[A] [2008]; NY Arthroscopy & Sports Medicine PLLC v Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp., 15 Misc 3d 89 [2007]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concurI concurI concur
Decision Date: January 14, 2010