| Five Boro Psychological Servs., P.C. v AutoOne Ins. Co. |
| 2010 NY Slip Op 50657(U) [27 Misc 3d 131(A)] |
| Decided on April 9, 2010 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Johnny
Lee Baynes, J.), entered October 29, 2008. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiff's
motion for summary judgment and granted defendant's cross motion seeking to dismiss the
complaint for plaintiff's failure to comply with defendant's discovery demands, or to compel such
discovery, to the extent of ordering plaintiff to comply with defendant's discovery demands with
respect to plaintiff's corporate status and any other non-precluded issues.
ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed without costs.
For the reasons stated in Five Boro Psychological Services, P.C. a/a/o Clarence Osbourne v AutoOne Ins. Co. (____ Misc 3d ____, 2010 NY Slip Op _____ [Appeal No. 2009-292 K C], decided herewith), the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed.
Golia, J.P., Weston and Rios, JJ., concur.
Decision Date: April 09, 2010