| Mustafa v Plein |
| 2010 NY Slip Op 52437(U) [34 Misc 3d 1235(A)] |
| Decided on October 25, 2010 |
| Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Kings County |
| Marton, J. |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Shirajul Mustafa,
Petitioner,
against Helgia Plein et al., Respondents |
Recitation pursuant to CPLR § 2219(a) of the papers considered in
review of these motions:
PapersNumbered
Order to show cause....................................................................1
The court file...............................................................................2
This is a holdover proceeding. The premises at issue is an unregulated apartment in a
three family house. On the proceeding's first return date of August 19, 2010 it was adjourned, as
is marked on the court's file jacket, so that respondent might seek counsel and for trial on
September 28, 2010. On that date, the scheduled trial was adjourned to October 8, 2010. On that
date respondent did not appear and, after an inquest, the court granted petitioner a judgment of
possession and a money judgment for $5,800.00 representing all rent/use & occupancy arrears
through October 31, 2010.
Now respondent moves for relief. The motion is granted only as set out below. To
vacate the default judgments herein, the court would have to find both that respondent's default
on October 8, 2010 was excusable and that she had a meritorious defense. Here, respondent
makes no showing of a meritorious defense, either to petitioner's claim for possession [*2]or to petitioner's claim for arrears[FN1]. Accordingly, the court denies the motion to the
extent that she seeks to vacate the judgments.
RPAPL § 753 provides that the court may stay the issuance and/or execution of
a warrant of eviction for a period of six months as long as respondent pays, either in whole or in
installments, use & occupancy going forward and any rent arrears and/or accrued use &
occupancy. The rent for the premises was $1,300.00 per month and neither party has offered any
evidence probative of a different value for the premises. Accordingly, the court grants
respondent's motion to the following extent: (a) the warrant may issue forthwith, (b) execution
shall be stayed through March 31, 2011 (for respondent to vacate the premises) as long as
respondent pays use & occupancy of $1,300.00 per month on the first of November 1, 2010 and
the first of every month thereafter, and also as long as respondent pays $1,500.00 per month on
the 15th of November, 2010, December, 2010, and January, 2011, and $1,100.00 on February 15,
2011 so as to discharge the accrued arrears, and (c) the warrant may be executed upon any default
in payment, and (d) regardless of any default in payment petitioner may have a marshal's notice
served on or after March 15, 2011 and may execute thereon on or after April 1, 2011.
The court will mail copies of this decision and order to the parties.
Dated: Brooklyn, New YorkOctober 25, 2010
GARY F. MARTON