People v Lugo-Rosado
2011 NY Slip Op 03405 [83 AD3d 1529]
April 29, 2011
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, June 8, 2011


The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Orlando Lugo-Rosado, Appellant.

[*1] Frank H. Hiscock Legal Aid Society, Syracuse (Philip Rothschild of counsel), for defendant-appellant.

William J. Fitzpatrick, District Attorney, Syracuse (James P. Maxwell of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Patrick J. Cunningham, J.), rendered August 9, 1991. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of conspiracy in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law and a new trial is granted on count four of the indictment.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of conspiracy in the second degree (Penal Law § 105.15). We agree with defendant that reversal is required. County Court's instructions to the jury on reasonable doubt unconstitutionally diminished the People's burden of proof, and defendant was thereby deprived of a fair trial (see People v Docen-Perez, 197 AD2d 865 [1993]; People v Towndrow, 187 AD2d 194, 195-196 [1993], lv dismissed 81 NY2d 1021 [1993]; People v Geddes, 186 AD2d 993 [1992]; see generally Victor v Nebraska, 511 US 1, 5 [1994], reh denied 511 US 1101 [1994]; Sullivan v Louisiana, 508 US 275, 280-281 [1993]). In light of our determination, we need not address defendant's remaining contentions. Present—Scudder, P.J., Fahey, Carni, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.