| Matter of Hill v Rawiszer |
| 2011 NY Slip Op 06034 [86 AD3d 615] |
| July 19, 2011 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| In the Matter of Loretta Hill, Respondent, v Daniel Rawiszer, Sr., Appellant. |
—[*1]
Susan Argento Ferlauto, Thornwood, N.Y., attorney for the child.
In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from (1) an order of the Family Court, Orange County (Woods, J.), entered July 16, 2010, which granted the mother's petition for modification of an order of visitation and (2) an order of the same court, also entered July 16, 2010, which dismissed the father's petition alleging violations of previous orders of visitation. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]) in which he moves to be relieved of the assignment to prosecute the appeal.
Ordered that the orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant's assigned counsel that, under the circumstances of this case, there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; Matter of Samantha G. [Luis G.], 82 AD3d 885 [2011]; Matter of Paola, 63 AD3d 743 [2009]; Matter of Duong v Duong, 51 AD3d 791 [2008]). Skelos, J.P., Leventhal, Austin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.