| Mulligan v Rausch |
| 2011 NY Slip Op 08128 [89 AD3d 811] |
| November 9, 2011 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| Thomas Mulligan, Respondent, v Harry A. Rausch, Jr., et al., Appellants, and Agostino Cervone, M.D., et al., Respondents. |
—[*1]
Salenger, Sack, Kimmel & Bavaro, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Carolyn Caccese of counsel), for
plaintiff-respondent.
Geisler & Gabriele, LLP, Garden City, N.Y. (Lori A. Marano and Paul Scotti of counsel), for
defendants-respondents George D. Keckeisen, Douglas M. Petraco, and Douglas M. Petraco,
M.D., P.C.
Furey, Kerley, Walsh, Matera & Cinquemani, P.C., Seaford, N.Y. (Lauren B. Bristol of
counsel), for defendant-respondent Peconic Bay Medical Center.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Harry A. Rausch, Jr., and Frances C. Rausch appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Sweeney, J.), entered September 30, 2010, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court properly determined there were triable issues of fact requiring the denial of the appellants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them. Rivera, J.P., Eng, Belen and Austin, JJ., concur.