| Matter of Thomas v O'Rourke |
| 2011 NY Slip Op 08764 [89 AD3d 1096] |
| November 29, 2011 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| In the Matter of Judith Thomas, Petitioner, v Eileen O'Rourke et al., Respondents. |
—[*1]
Kathleen E. Gill, New Rochelle, N.Y. (Kenneth E. Powell of counsel), for respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Section 8 Administrator for the City of New Rochelle dated May 8, 2010, which, after a hearing, confirmed the termination of the petitioner's participation in the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.
The record contains substantial evidence to support the respondents' determination terminating the petitioner's participation in the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program (see 24 CFR 982.552 [b] [2] [2010]; Matter of Friend v Mulligan, 16 AD3d 685, 686 [2005]; Matter of Douglas v Lannert, 272 AD2d 327 [2000]). In addition, the notice of termination adequately apprised the petitioner of the violations upon which the termination of her benefits from the program was based (see Matter of Block v Ambach, 73 NY2d 323, 333 [1989]; Matter of Friend v Mulligan, 16 AD3d at 686).
The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit. Dillon, J.P., Angiolillo, Florio and Dickerson, JJ., concur.