Landlord appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Brenda S. Spears, J.), dated September 10, 2010, which denied its motion for the entry of a default final judgment against tenant, and for summary judgment against respondent Kassem Fares in a holdover summary proceeding.

Per Curiam.

Order (Brenda S. Spears, J.), dated September 10, 2010, affirmed, with $10 costs.

We agree that this holdover summary proceeding against the rent-stabilized tenant and her son is not ripe for summary disposition. The record raises several triable issues as to whether, inter alia, landlord consented or acquiesced to any of the alterations to the subject apartment, including the installation of a stove, and whether those alterations constituted "significant violation[s]" of the "no alterations" clause of the parties' lease agreement (Ram I v Stuart, 248 AD2d 255, 256 [1998]; see Garay v Devine, NYLJ, October 27, 1989, at 21, col 1; Solow v Lubliner, NYLJ, June 6, 1990, at 21, col 2).

Given the strong "public policy [which] favors the disposition of matters on their merits" (Bunch v Dollar Budget, Inc., 12 AD3d 391 [2004]), we find no abuse of discretion in the denial of the entry of a default judgment against tenant at this juncture (id.; see Ahmad v Aniolowiski, 28 AD3d 692, 692-693 [2006]).

We have considered landlord's remaining contentions and find them lacking in substantial merit.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: June 08, 2011