| Williams v Fedex |
| 2011 NY Slip Op 51242(U) [32 Misc 3d 1210(A)] |
| Decided on July 7, 2011 |
| City Court Of Mount Vernon |
| Seiden, J. |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Harold Williams,
Plaintiff,
against Fedex, Defendant. |
Plaintiff brought this small claims proceeding alleging three hundred thirty
two
dollars ($332.00) in damages caused by defendant's loss of his property. It is
uncontested that the plaintiff ordered a digital camera from Fingerhut on
December 15, 2010 and paid for same in full. The camera was shipped via Fedex
Ground and plaintiff never received it.
Defendant showed proof of delivery (business record) on December 20, 2010. It
was allegedly signed for by one T. Jame at the address the package was shipped to by
defendant.
Plaintiff has standing to sue as a third party beneficiary to the contract entered
into by the shipper (Fingerhut) and carrier (Fedex Ground). In order to recover as
third-party beneficiary to a contract, plaintiff must establish: "(1) the existence of a valid and
binding contract between other parties, (2) that the contract was intended for their benefit, and (3)
that the benefit to them is sufficiently immediate to . . . indicate the assumption by the
contracting parties of a duty to compensate them if the benefit is lost" (Mandarin Trading Ltd. v Wildenstein,
16 NY3d 173 (2011)(citation omitted); see also Saratoga Schenectady Gastroentrology
Associates, P.C., et al. v. Bette & Cring, LLC, 921 N.Y.S.2d 393 (2011)). Under New York
law, a third party beneficiary is entitled only to those rights which the original parties to the
contract intended the third party to have ( Republic of Iraq v. ABB AG, et al. WL 781192
(2011). Accordingly, as a third party beneficiary, the plaintiff has no rights beyond those stated in
the contract.
[*2]
In the case at bar the shipper declared no value when
entering into the contract
with the carrier. As a result, the limit of liability is one hundred dollars ($100.00)
pursuant to the shipping contract.
Judgment for plaintiff in the sum of one hundred dollars ($100.00).
The above complies with this Courts statutory charge to do substantial justice
between the parties.
The above constitutes the Decision and Order of the Court.
Dated: Mount Vernon, New York
July 7, 2011
HON. ADAM SEIDEN
Associate City Judge of Mount Vernon
AS:mjc & akb
To:Harold Williams
1815 Bruckner Boulevard
Apt. 6D
Bronx, New York 10472
Fedex
669 S. 3rd Aenue
Mount Vernon, New York 10550