| Rosen v Torres |
| 2011 NY Slip Op 52206(U) [33 Misc 3d 142(A)] |
| Decided on December 5, 2011 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Peter Paul
Sweeney, J.; op 26 Misc 3d 1231[A], 2010 NY Slip Op 50340[U]), entered February 24, 2010.
The order denied defendant's motion for leave to amend the answer to include the defense of
usury, and, upon the granting of leave, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs.
For the reasons stated in Feldman v Torres (___ Misc 3d ___, 2011 NY Slip Op _______ [Appeal No. 2010-1311 K C], decided herewith), the order is affirmed.
Pesce, P.J., Weston and Steinhardt, JJ., concur.
Decision Date: December 05, 2011