| Gibson v Buckley |
| 2011 NY Slip Op 52213(U) [33 Misc 3d 142(A)] |
| Decided on December 5, 2011 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Appeal from a judgment of the City Court of Rye, Westchester County (Joseph L. Latwin,
J.), entered April 23, 2010. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal
sum of $1,650.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
In this small claims action, plaintiff seeks to recover fees for architectural services rendered
to defendant. After a nonjury trial, the City Court awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $1,650.
Upon a review of the record, we find that substantial justice was done between the parties in
accordance with the rules and principles of
substantive law (UJCA 1804, 1807). The evidence adduced at trial established that plaintiff
had performed the architectural services before defendant had terminated the contract.
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
Molia, J.P., LaCava and Iannacci, JJ., concur.
Decision Date: December 05, 2011