—[*1] Ruth Marshall, Brooklyn, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Naimark & Tannenbaum, Jamaica, N.Y. (Eliot Tannenbaum of counsel), for respondent.

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant former wife appeals, as limited by her brief, from stated portions of a judgment of divorce of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Sunshine, J.), entered September 16, 2008, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, declared that all ancillary issues had been resolved, and that the issue of equitable distribution had been resolved by a determination of the same court (Henderson, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated February 8, 2007, made after a hearing on that issue.

Ordered that the judgment of divorce is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

At the trial on the issue of divorce only, the parties, who were represented by counsel, withdrew from dispute all ancillary issues other than equitable distribution, and the trial court, upon the stipulation of the parties, in effect, severed the claim for equitable distribution and referred it to a Referee to hear and determine. After a trial on the issue of equitable distribution, the Referee issued a determination, and a judgment distributing the parties' assets was entered on the determination. In a separate judgment of divorce, which is the subject of this appeal, the Supreme Court awarded the parties a divorce, and declared, inter alia, that all ancillary issues had been resolved, and that the issue of equitable distribution had been resolved by the Special Referee.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the record reflects the fact that she withdrew from dispute all ancillary issues other than equitable distribution when she withdrew all of her counterclaims for, among other things, maintenance and an award of an attorney's fee.

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit. Angiolillo, J.P., Lott, Austin and Cohen, JJ., concur.