Matter of Coleman v Fox
2012 NY Slip Op 01910 [93 AD3d 1188]
March 16, 2012
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, April 25, 2012


In the Matter of Carmen Coleman, Appellant, v Tracy Fox, Respondent. (Appeal No. 2.)

[*1] Carmen Coleman, petitioner-appellant pro se.

Tracy Fox, respondent-respondent pro se. Michael A. Rosenbloom, Attorney for the Child, Rochester, for Justin f.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Monroe County (Dandrea L. Ruhlmann, J.), entered September 17, 2010 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order denied the motion of petitioner for attorneys' fees.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Matter of Fox v Coleman (93 AD3d 1187 [2012]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Smith, Fahey, Carni and Sconiers, JJ.