Matter of Bradley v Town of Boonville Zoning Bd. of Appeals
2012 NY Slip Op 01970 [93 AD3d 1228]
March 16, 2012
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, April 25, 2012


In the Matter of Frances S. Bradley, Respondent, v Town of Boonville Zoning Board of Appeals, Respondent. Forrest C. Bartelotte et al. Intervenors-Appellants. (Appeal No. 1.)

—[*1] Durr & Riley, Boonville, Peter M. Hobaica, LLC, Utica (George E. Curtis of counsel), for Intervenors-Appellants.

The Ayers Law Firm, PLLC, Palatine Bridge (Meghan M. Manion of counsel), for petitioner-respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Bernadette T. Clark, J.), entered February 18, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The order granted petitioner two variances.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988 [1988]; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567 [1978]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Smith, Carni and Sconiers, JJ.