People v Jabbar
2012 NY Slip Op 06649 [99 AD3d 448]
October 4, 2012
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, November 28, 2012


The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Naim Jabbar, Appellant.

[*1] Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Carl S. Kaplan of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Karinna M. Arroyo of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered January 6, 2011, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the third degree and fraudulent accosting, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 3½ to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

We reject defendant's challenges to the sufficiency and weight of the evidence supporting the robbery conviction (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury's credibility determinations. The evidence amply supported the conclusion that, after unsuccessfully attempting to take the victim's money by way of a confidence game, defendant took the money by force (see e.g. People v Spencer, 255 AD2d 167 [1st Dept 1998], lv denied 93 NY2d 879 [1999]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Sweeny, Catterson, Moskowitz and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.