| Lambe v Lenox Hill Hosp. |
| 2012 NY Slip Op 07865 [100 AD3d 518] |
| November 20, 2012 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| Michael Lambe, Appellant, v Lenox Hill Hospital et al., Defendants, and Smith Carroad Levy P.C., Respondent. |
—[*1]
Smith, Carroad, Levy & Wan, Commack (Timothy Wan of counsel), for
respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard F. Braun, J.), entered July 27, 2011, which granted defendant-respondent's (defendant) motion to dismiss the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable cause of action as against defendant. Indeed, read generously, the complaint merely alleges that defendant issued restraining notices on a duly filed default judgment, obtained by predecessor counsel. This conduct does not amount to a tort (Caribbean Constr. Servs. & Assoc. v Zurich Ins. Co., 267 AD2d 81, 83 [1st Dept 1999]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Acosta and Freedman, JJ.