| Citibank (SD), N.A. v Harry |
| 2012 NY Slip Op 52273(U) [37 Misc 3d 141(A)] |
| Decided on December 7, 2012 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County
(Anna Culley, J.), entered July 15, 2011, deemed from a judgment of the same court
entered August 16, 2011 (see CPLR 5501 [c]). The judgment, entered pursuant to the
July 15, 2011 order granting plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, awarded plaintiff
the principal sum of $24,499.23.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
In this action to recover for breach of a credit card agreement, defendant appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. A judgment was subsequently entered in favor of plaintiff in the principal sum of $24,499.23 from which the appeal is deemed to have been taken (see CPLR 5501 [c]).
We find that plaintiff established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on its cause of action for breach of a credit card agreement. Plaintiff presented the statements itemizing the credit card transactions and purchases, proving that defendant had used the credit card that had been issued to him (see Citibank [SD], N.A. v Minhas, 35 Misc 3d 128[A], 2012 NY Slip Op 50586[U] [App Term, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2012]). Defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Consequently, we find no basis to disturb the judgment.
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. [*2]
Rios, J.P., Aliotta and Solomon, JJ., concur.
Decision Date: December 07, 2012