Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept.
2013 NY Slip Op 00886 [20 NY3d 1028]
February 12, 2013
Court of Appeals
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, March 27, 2013


[*1]
In the Matter of Perry Bellamy, Appellant,
v
New York City Police Department, Respondent.

Decided February 12, 2013

Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept., 87 AD3d 874, affirmed.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Perry Bellamy, appellant pro se.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Sharyn Rootenberg and Larry A. Sonnenshein of counsel), for respondent.

{**20 NY3d at 1029} OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, without costs, and certified question not answered on the ground that it is unnecessary. In denying the subject Freedom of Information Law request, the Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith and Pigott. Taking no part: Judge Rivera.