Matter of Lacorte v Cytryn
2013 NY Slip Op 05709 [21 NY3d 1022]
August 22, 2013
Court of Appeals
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, October 9, 2013


[*1]
In the Matter of Dagan Lacorte, Appellant,
v
Howard L. Cytryn et al., Respondents, et al., Respondent. (And Another Proceeding.)

Argued August 21, 2013; decided August 22, 2013

Matter of Lacorte v Cytryn, 109 AD3d 544, affirmed.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Stroock, Stroock & Lavan, LLP, New York City (Jerry H. Goldfeder of counsel), for appellant.

Alan Goldston, Scarsdale, for Howard L. Cytryn and others, respondents.

Jeffrey J. Fortunato, County Attorney, New City (Thomas M. Mascola of counsel), for Rockland County Board of Elections, respondent.

{**21 NY3d at 1023} OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

The Appellate Division properly determined that the validating petition did not sufficiently specify which determinations of the Board petitioner claimed were erroneous (see Matter of Krueger v Richards, 59 NY2d 680, 682 [1983]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.