People v Santiago
2013 NY Slip Op 06029 [109 AD3d 1009]
September 25, 2013
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, October 30, 2013


The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Cheryl A. Santiago, Appellant.

[*1] Malvina Nathanson, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Kirsten A. Rappleyea of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from a resentence of the County Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), imposed December 12, 2012, upon remittitur from this Court (see People v Santiago, 97 AD3d 704 [2012], lv granted 20 NY3d 935 [2012]), on the ground that the resentence was excessive.

Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the resentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Angiolillo, Balkin and Hall, JJ., concur.