York v York
2014 NY Slip Op 00178 [22 NY3d 1051]
January 14, 2014
Court of Appeals
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, March 12, 2014


[*1]
Esther York, Appellant,
v
Joseph York, Respondent.

Decided January 14, 2014

York v York, 98 AD3d 1038, affirmed.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Newman & Greenberg, New York City (Richard A. Greenberg, William J. Dobie and Gustave H. Newman of counsel), for appellant.

Snitow Kanfer Holtzer & Millus, LLP, New York City (Franklyn H. Snitow of counsel), for respondent.

{**22 NY3d at 1052} OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative. The order below was not an abuse of discretion.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam.