Matter of McIver-Morgan, Inc. v Dal Piaz
2014 NY Slip Op 01104 [22 NY3d 1104]
February 18, 2014
Court of Appeals
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, April 2, 2014


[*1]
In the Matter of McIver-Morgan, Inc., Respondent,
v
Christopher Dal Piaz et al., Appellants.

Decided February 18, 2014

Matter of McIver-Morgan, Inc. v Dal Piaz, 108 AD3d 47, affirmed.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Massoud & Pashkoff, LLP, New York City (Ahmed A. Massoud of counsel), for appellants.

Feldman & Associates, PLLC, New York City (Edward S. Feldman of counsel), for respondent.

{**22 NY3d at 1105} OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and the certified question not answered upon the ground that it is unnecessary. The Appellate Division correctly determined that vacatur of the arbitration award would require an impermissible fact-intensive review by the courts.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Abdus-Salaam. Taking no part: Judge Rivera.