| Matter of Miller v Marano |
| 2014 NY Slip Op 02298 [116 AD3d 702] |
| April 2, 2014 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| In the Matter of Daniel Miller,
Petitioner, v Anthony Marano et al., Respondents. |
—[*1]
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Garrett Coyle of counsel), for respondents.
Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,
Ordered that upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, the respondents' motion to dismiss the petition is denied, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,
Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the respondents' contentions, the petitioner has standing to prosecute this proceeding, and the allegations in the petition are sufficient to state a cause of action (see CPLR 3211 [a] [3], [7]).
Nonetheless, "[b]ecause of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court—in cases where judicial authority is challenged—acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers" (Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 NY2d 564, 569 [1988] see Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 NY2d 348, 352 [1986]). [*2]
The petitioner failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Dillon, J.P., Hall, Austin and Duffy, JJ., concur.