| Matter of Gina Maritza S. (Lisa S.) |
| 2014 NY Slip Op 02684 [116 AD3d 570] |
| April 17, 2014 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| In the Matter of Gina Maritza S. and Others, Children Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Lisa S., Also Known as Lisa V., Appellant; Episcopal Social Services, Respondent. |
—[*1]
Rosin Steinhagen Mendel, New York (Douglas H. Reiniger of counsel), for
respondent.
Richard L. Herzfeld, P.C., New York (Richard L. Herzfeld of counsel), attorney for
the children Gina Maritza S., Brianna J.B. and Cassandra Aaliya J.B.
Daniel R. Katz, New York, attorney for the children Jennifer Elizabeth W. and
Vincent Taylor W.
Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Clark V. Richardson, J.), entered on or about February 22, 2013, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, after a hearing, determined that respondent-appellant mother had permanently neglected the subject children, terminated her parental rights to the children, and committed custody and guardianship of the children to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of the Administration for Children's Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
There was clear and convincing evidence that the agency exerted diligent efforts to reunite the mother with the children by creating a service plan for the mother, referring her to domestic violence counseling and a program for sex abusers, scheduling numerous service plan reviews, and scheduling supervised and unsupervised visitation with the children (see Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a], [f]). Despite these efforts, the mother failed to address the problems that led to the children's placement into foster care, including the ongoing sexual abuse of the children.
A preponderance of the evidence supports the court's determination that it is in the [*2]children's best interests to terminate the mother's parental rights rather than issue a suspended judgment (see Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 NY2d 136, 147-148 [1984]). The mother failed to demonstrate that she had made substantial progress in addressing the problems in her home. Concur—Renwick, J.P., Moskowitz, DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels and Feinman, JJ.