Powell v City of New York
2014 NY Slip Op 02704 [116 AD3d 589]
April 22, 2014
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, May 28, 2014


Hollye D. Powell, Respondent,
v
City of New York, Appellant.

[*1] Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Drake A. Colley of counsel), for appellant.

Sobel, Ross, Fliegel & Stieglitz, LLP, New York (Michael P. Stieglitz of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kibbie F. Payne, J.), entered November 9, 2012, which granted plaintiff's motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) to set aside a jury verdict in defendant's favor, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and the motion denied. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing the complaint.

The jury's verdict, that plaintiff's slip-and-fall accident was not a proximate cause of her injuries, was based on a fair interpretation of the evidence (see Grassi v Ulrich, 87 NY2d 954, 956 [1996] Goldstein v Snyder, 3 AD3d 332, 334 [1st Dept 2004]). Indeed, plaintiff's own doctor testified that her degenerative disc disease predated the accident, and that she had a normal neurological exam after the accident. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, DeGrasse, Freedman and Kapnick, JJ.