| People v Caza |
| 2014 NYSlipOp 08058 [24 NY3d 1056] |
| November 20, 2014 |
| Court of Appeals |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| As corrected through Wednesday, February 18, 2015 |
| The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Karen M. Caza, Appellant. |
Decided November 20, 2014
People v Caza, 115 AD3d 1118, affirmed.
Martin J. McGuinness, Queensbury, for appellant.
Respondent precluded.
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant's argument that County Court erred in enhancing her sentence by departing from its conditional promise to make her two terms of imprisonment run concurrently is unpreserved for our review (see CPL [*2]470.05 [2]; People v Hawkins, 11 NY3d 484, 491-493 [2008]).
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, in a memorandum.