| People v Ingram |
| 2014 NY Slip Op 08763 [24 NY3d 1105] |
| December 16, 2014 |
| Court of Appeals |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| As corrected through Wednesday, March 11, 2015 |
| The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Robert L. Ingram, Respondent. |
Decided December 16, 2014
People v Ingram, 114 AD3d 1290, affirmed.
Frank A. Sedita, III, District Attorney, Buffalo (David A. Heraty of counsel), for appellant.
Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc., Buffalo (Sherry A. Chase of counsel), for respondent.
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The determination whether police have reasonable suspicion to justify a stop involves a mixed question of law and fact (People v Woods, 98 NY2d 627, 628 [2002]). Where, as here, there exists record support for the Appellate Division's resolution of this question, the issue is beyond this Court's further review.
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, in a memorandum.