Heltz v Barratt
2014 NY Slip Op 08791 [24 NY3d 1185]
December 17, 2014
Court of Appeals
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, April 1, 2015


[*1]
Mary T. Heltz, Appellant,
v
Bruce S. Barratt et al., Respondents.

Decided December 17, 2014

Heltz v Barratt, 115 AD3d 1298, affirmed.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Personius Melber LLP, Buffalo (Scott R. Hapeman of counsel), for appellant.

Barth Sullivan Behr, Buffalo (Andrew J. Kowalewski of counsel), for respondents.

{**24 NY3d at 1186} OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order af{**24 NY3d at 1187}firmed, with costs. Plaintiff failed to produce admissible evidence raising a triable issue of fact concerning whether defendant Barratt had an opportunity to avoid the collision.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam.