The People ex rel. Duchnowski v New York State Div. of Parole
2014 NY Slip Op 09163 [123 AD3d 1156]
December 31, 2014
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, January 28, 2015


[*1]
 The People of the State of New York ex rel. Leo Duchnowski, Appellant,
v
New York State Division of Parole et al., Respondents.

Christopher J. Cassar, P.C., Huntington, N.Y. (Richard Toscani of counsel), for appellant.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Michael S. Belohlavek and Matthew W. Grieco of counsel; Hailey A. Bair on the brief), for respondent New York State Division of Parole.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70 for a writ of habeas corpus, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Calabrese, J.), entered October 2, 2013, which, after a hearing, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the respondents demonstrated that he knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to a preliminary parole revocation hearing (see Executive Law § 259-i [3] [c] [i]; Matter of White v New York State Div. of Parole, 60 NY2d 920 [1983]; People ex rel. Strickland v Miranda, 264 AD2d 789, 789 [1999]; People ex rel. Aquino v New York State Bd. of Parole, 250 AD2d 789, 789 [1998]; People ex rel. Romero v Johnson, 122 AD2d 240, 241 [1986]; cf. People ex rel. Melendez v Warden of Rikers Is. Correctional Facility, 214 AD2d 301, 301-303 [1995]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding. Skelos, J.P., Dickerson, Austin and Maltese, JJ., concur.