| Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v Harewood |
| 2014 NY Slip Op 50339(U) [42 Misc 3d 145(A)] |
| Decided on February 28, 2014 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County
(Nancy M. Bannon, J.), entered October 5, 2011. The order denied defendant's motion to
vacate an order of seizure of the same court dated August 1, 2011.
ORDERED that the order entered October 5, 2011 is affirmed, without costs.
After defendant, the owner of a three-family home, allegedly failed to pay her gas bills, plaintiff commenced this action. On August 1, 2011, plaintiff obtained an order of seizure pursuant to CPLR 7102. Nearly two months later, defendant moved to vacate the order of seizure, which motion the Civil Court denied by order entered October 5, 2011.
Upon a review of the record, we find no basis to vacate the order of seizure (see Siemens Med. Solutions USA, Inc. v Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assoc. of Queens, P.C., 100 AD3d 620, 621 [2012] Consolidated Edison of NY, Inc. v Halo, 2003 NY Slip Op 50973[U] [App Term, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2003]). We note that financial hardship is not a meritorious defense and a ground for vacatur of an order of seizure.
Accordingly, the order entered October 5, 2011 is affirmed.
Weston, J.P., Aliotta and Solomon, JJ., concur.
Decision Date: February 28, 2014