Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Richmond County (Philip S. Straniere, J.), entered November 2, 2012. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs.

In this action, plaintiff seeks to recover damages for injuries sustained when she was attacked, while on her own property at 754 Seaview Avenue in Staten Island, by a dog allegedly owned by a tenant living on defendant's property at 738 Seaview Avenue. By order entered November 2, 2012, the Civil Court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Under the circumstances presented, we find that defendant owed no duty of care to plaintiff (see Walker v Gold, 70 AD3d 1349 [2010] Seiger v Dercole, 50 AD3d 1524 [2010] Ruffin v Dykes, 37 AD3d 1191 [2007] Gomez v Delacruz, 27 AD3d 219 [2006] Braithwaite v Presidential Property Servs. Inc., 24 AD3d 487 [2005] Weipert v Oldfield, 298 AD2d 974 [2002] Philips v Coffee To Go, 269 AD2d 123 [2000]). Plaintiff failed to establish that defendant knew or should have known of the dog's vicious propensities, and that defendant had sufficient "control of the premises or otherwise had the ability to remove or confine the dog" (Phillips v Coffee To Go, 269 AD2d at 124). Consequently, the court properly granted defendant's motion for summary judgment.

Accordingly, the order is affirmed.

Weston, J.P., Pesce and Aliotta, JJ., concur.
Decision Date: April 07, 2014