| Promed Orthocare Supply, Inc. v GEICO Ins. Co. |
| 2014 NY Slip Op 50878(U) [43 Misc 3d 143(A)] |
| Decided on May 22, 2014 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Carmen R. Velasquez, J.), entered February 16, 2012. The order, insofar as appealed from, upon denying plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, made, in effect, CPLR 3212 (g) findings in plaintiff's favor, and denied defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, with $25 costs.
For the reasons stated in Promed Durable Equip., Inc. as Assignee of Keisha Diaz v GEICO Ins. (__ Misc 3d __, 2014 NY Slip Op ______ [Appeal No. 2012-95 K C], decided herewith), the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed.
Pesce, P.J., Aliotta and Solomon, JJ., concur.