| People v Sign FX, Inc. |
| 2014 NY Slip Op 50925(U) [43 Misc 3d 1234(A)] |
| Decided on June 16, 2014 |
| Supreme Court, Dutchess County |
| Pagones, J. |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
People of the
State of New York, by ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, Attorney General of the State of
New York, Petitioner,
against Sign FX, Inc. and MICHAEL PALAZZO, Respondents. |
Petitioner seeks a judgment and order, pursuant to Executive Law §63(12) and General Business Law Article 22-A, providing for the following relief: (1) permanently [*2]enjoining respondents, their, agents, successors, representatives, employees, and any other corporation or entity in which they are a principal, owner, officer or manager, from violating Executive Law §63(12) and Article 22-A of the General Business Law ("GBL") and from engaging in the fraudulent, deceptive and illegal practices alleged in the Verified Petition herein, including, but not limited to, promising customers to perform and complete contracts for signs by certain dates, taking money in advance of completion of the jobs, failing to do the jobs in the time promised and failing to refund the customers' advance payments; making excuses for delays in performance of contacts which excuses are not truthful, failing to return customers' calls and failing to inform them of the status
Upon the foregoing papers, the petition is granted in its entirety. A corporation or [*3]voluntary association is required to appear by an attorney (see CPLR §321[a]). Here, the answer to the petition is signed by respondent Michael Palazzo on his own behalf and on behalf of respondent Sign FX, Inc. As respondent Michael Palazzo is not an attorney, he cannot appear on behalf of the corporate respondent (id.). Thus, the petition is granted as to respondent Sign FX, Inc. on default.
The sworn answer of respondent Michael Palazzo's fails to controvert any of the allegations in the petition or in any of his customers' affidavits which are attached to the petition as exhibits.
As the petition and supporting papers contain sufficient allegations of fact to merit the relief requested and the respondents have raised no triable issues of fact by an evidentiary showing, but only assert conclusory statements in a general denial, judgment without trial is proper (see Matter of People v. Telehublink Corp., 301 AD2d 1006 [3rd Dept 2003]). Accordingly, the petition is granted in its entirety.The foregoing constitutes the decision and order of this court. Petitioner is directed to submit a judgment consistent with the aforestated on seven (7) days notice within thirty (30) days hereof.
This decision and order has been filed electronically.
Dated:ENTER
_______________________________