| Parache v DD 11th Ave. LLC |
| 2015 NY Slip Op 01863 [126 AD3d 441] |
| March 5, 2015 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| Dennis Parache, Plaintiff, v DD 11th Avenue LLC et al., Appellants/Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants/Second Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Mastercraft Masonry I, Inc., Respondent/Third-Party Defendant-Respondent, et al., Defendant. SMEG Corporation, Second Third-Party Defendant-Respondent, et al., Second Third-Party Defendant. |
Faust, Goetz, Schenker & Blee LLP, New York (Jeffrey Rubinstein of counsel), for appellants.
Cozen O'Connor, New York (Edward Hayum of counsel), for respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard F. Braun, J.), entered July 3, 2014, [*2]which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted the motion of defendant/third-party defendant Mastercraft Masonry I, Inc. (Mastercraft) and second third-party defendant SMEG Corporation (SMEG) for summary judgment dismissing all cross claims and third-party claims as against them, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The record establishes that Mastercraft and SMEG were members of defendant-appellant J E Levine Builder Inc.'s Contractor Controlled Insurance Program. Accordingly, the antisubrogation rule bars the cross claims and third-party claims brought by defendants-appellants against Mastercraft and SMEG (see e.g. ELRAC, Inc. v Ward, 96 NY2d 58, 76-77 [2001]; Stranz v New York State Energy Research & Dev. Auth. [NYSERDA], 87 AD3d 1279, 1281-1282 [4th Dept 2011]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Clark and Kapnick, JJ.