Miller v Ludwig
2015 NY Slip Op 02344 [126 AD3d 1397]
March 20, 2015
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, April 29, 2015


[*1]
  Laurie R. Miller et al., Doing Business as Pine Hill Stables, Respondents, v Doris Ludwig et al., Defendants, and Mary Morrison, Appellant.

Law Office of Tonie M. Franzese, P.C., Northville, Michigan (Tonie M. Franzese, of the Michigan and California Bars, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel), for defendant-appellant.

Christopher C. Shambo, Ballston Spa (Alexander Phengsiaroun of counsel), for plaintiffs-respondents.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Steuben County (Joseph W. Latham, A.J.), dated March 28, 2014. The order, in essence, denied the motion of defendant Mary Morrison for leave to reargue a prior motion to dismiss.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: Although defendant-appellant purports to appeal from an order denying a motion to dismiss, the record establishes that she is actually appealing from an order denying a motion for leave to reargue a prior motion to dismiss. It is well settled that no appeal lies from an order denying a motion for leave to reargue (see MidFirst Bank v Storto, 121 AD3d 1575, 1575 [2014]; Britt v Buffalo Mun. Hous. Auth., 115 AD3d 1252, 1252 [2014]). Present—Smith, J.P., Peradotto, Lindley, Valentino and Whalen, JJ.