Wall St. Mtge. Bankers v Gonzalez
2015 NY Slip Op 02420 [126 AD3d 602]
March 24, 2015
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, April 29, 2015


[*1]
 Wall Street Mortgage Bankers, Respondent,
v
Socrates Gonzalez, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

David A. Bythewood, Mineola, for appellant.

Rosicki, Rosicki & Associates, P.C., Plainview (Owen M. Robinson of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mark Friedlander, J.), entered July 10, 2013, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on its mortgage foreclosure claim against defendant Socrates Gonzalez, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff made a prima facie showing of its right to foreclosure by producing the note, mortgage and evidence of nonpayment, and, in opposition, defendant failed to raise a triable issue regarding his affirmative defenses (see Red Tulip, LLC v Neiva, 44 AD3d 204, 209 [1st Dept 2007], lv dismissed 10 NY3d 741 [2008]). The court properly disregarded the mistake in the pleadings stating that plaintiff was a Delaware corporation (see CPLR 2001), and defendant otherwise failed to establish a triable issue regarding plaintiff's standing.

We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Sweeny, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.