| Thomas v New York City Hous. Auth. |
| 2015 NY Slip Op 04679 [25 NY3d 1087] |
| June 4, 2015 |
| Court of Appeals |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| As corrected through Wednesday, July 27, 2015 |
| Calvin E. Thomas, Respondent, v New York City Housing Authority, Appellant. |
Decided June 4, 2015
Thomas v New York City Hous. Auth., 120 AD3d 401, reversed.
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP, New York City (Patrick J. Lawless of counsel), for appellant.
Burns & Harris, New York City (Blake G. Goldfarb of counsel), for respondent.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, case remitted to the Appellate Division, First Department, for consideration of issues raised but not determined on the appeal to that Court, and certified question answered in the negative. The allegations in the notice of claim were not sufficient to put defendant on notice of the allegations in the bill of particulars concerning the handrail.
Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein and Fahey.