[*1]
Minuto v East End Auto Repair
2015 NY Slip Op 50084(U) [46 Misc 3d 139(A)]
Decided on January 15, 2015
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.


Decided on January 15, 2015
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

PRESENT: : MARANO, J.P., TOLBERT and GARGUILO, JJ.
2013-1920 S C

Vincent F. Minuto, Appellant,

against

East End Auto Repair, Respondent.


Appeal from a judgment of the Justice Court of the Town of East Hampton, Suffolk County (Catherine A. Cahill, J.), entered April 9, 2013. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff commenced this action to recover the sum of $1,225.25, alleging that defendant had performed unauthorized work on plaintiff's vehicle. After a nonjury trial, the Justice Court dismissed the complaint.

In reviewing a determination made after a nonjury trial, the power of this court is as broad as that of the trial court, and this court may render the judgment it finds warranted by the facts, bearing in mind that the trial judge had the advantage of seeing the witnesses and hearing their testimony (see Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of Bedford, 60 NY2d 492, 499 [1983]; Hamilton v Blackwood, 85 AD3d 1116 [2011]; Zeltser v Sacerdote, 52 AD3d 824, 826 [2008]). Upon a review of the record, we find no basis to disturb the judgment of the Justice Court.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

Marano, J.P., Tolbert and Garguilo, JJ., concur.


Decision Date: January 15, 2015