Appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Alexander Calabrese, J.), rendered October 22, 2007. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, convicted defendant of patronizing a prostitute in the fourth degree.

ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

After a nonjury trial, defendant was convicted of patronizing a prostitute in the fourth degree (Penal Law former § 230.03). On appeal, defendant contends that the guilty verdict was against the weight of the evidence.

Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the guilty verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 [2007]). As defendant's testimony gave a different account ofthe events than that presented by the People's witnesses, the respective testimonies presented an issue of credibility. However, the resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded the evidence presented, is for the trier of fact, which had the opportunity to see and hear the witnesses (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]). The determination of the trier of fact should be afforded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see People v Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004]). In our view, there is no basis to disturb the Criminal Court's credibility determinations.

Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Pesce, P.J., Weston and Elliot, JJ., concur.