| Matter of Ming Tung v China Buddhist Assn. |
| 2016 NY Slip Op 01210 [26 NY3d 1152] |
| February 18, 2016 |
| Court of Appeals |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| As corrected through Wednesday, April 27, 2016 |
| In the Matter of Ming Tung et al., Appellants, v China Buddhist Association et al., Respondents. |
Decided February 18, 2016
Matter of Ming Tung v China Buddhist Assn., 124 AD3d 13, affirmed.
Alexander Palmer Kelly, New York City, for appellants.
Capell Barnett Matalon & Schoenfeld LLP, New York City (Joseph Milano of counsel), for respondents.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order of the Appellate Division affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated by Justice Judith J. Gische at the Appellate Division, First Department (124 AD3d 13 [2014]), and certified question not answered upon the ground that it is unnecessary.
Concur: Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia.