Matter of Machado v Tanoury
2016 NY Slip Op 06325 [142 AD3d 1323]
September 30, 2016
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, November 2, 2016


[*1]
 In the Matter of Douglas C. Machado, Appellant, v Chandra V. Tanoury, Respondent. (Appeal No. 2.)

Koslosky & Koslosky, Utica (William L. Koslosky of counsel), for petitioner-appellant.

Cara A. Waldman, Fairport, for respondent-respondent.

Michele E. Detraglia, Attorney for the Child, Utica.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (Randal B. Caldwell, J.), entered May 5, 2015 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the petition.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Matter of Machado v Tanoury ([appeal No. 1] 142 AD3d 1322 [2016]). Present—Whalen, P.J., Carni, Lindley, DeJoseph and NeMoyer, JJ.