[*1]
People v Canavan (Charles)
2016 NY Slip Op 51017(U) [52 Misc 3d 133(A)]
Decided on June 23, 2016
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.


Decided on June 23, 2016
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

PRESENT: : GARGUILO, J.P., IANNACCI and BRANDS, JJ.
2014-484 S CR

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Charles Canavan, Appellant.


Appeal from a judgment of the Justice Court of the Town of East Hampton, Suffolk County (Catherine A. Cahill, J.), rendered February 10, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, after a nonjury trial, of failing to obtain a permit for a mass gathering in violation of East Hampton Town Code § 151-7.

ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is reversed, on the facts, and the accusatory instrument is dismissed.

Defendant, who was alleged in an accusatory instrument to be the event coordinator for a boat party, was charged with violating East Hampton Town Code § 151-7 for failing to obtain a permit for the "mass gathering." After a nonjury trial, the Justice Court found defendant guilty and imposed a fine of $2,000.

Defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction (see CPL 470.05; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 20-21 [1995]; People v Boyle, 289 AD2d 251 [2001]), and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see People v Henderson, 120 AD3d 1258 [2014]; People v Bridges, 63 AD3d 752 [2009]). However, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the evidence (see CPL 470.15), we find that the guilty verdict, based on a determination that defendant was the event coordinator, was against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 [2007]; People v Samuels, 130 AD3d 757 [2015]). In view of the foregoing, we pass on no other issues.

Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is reversed and the accusatory instrument is dismissed.


Garguilo, J.P., Iannacci and Brands, JJ., concur.


Decision Date: June 23, 2016