Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Julio Rodriguez III, J.), rendered April 17, 2015, convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of one count of criminal contempt in the second degree, and imposing sentence.

Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Julio Rodriguez III, J.), rendered April 17, 2015, affirmed.

Defendant's present challenge to the knowing, voluntary and intelligent nature of his guilty plea, to the extent preserved for appellate review, is without merit. The record reveals that Criminal Court vacated defendant's initial guilty plea, directed a second call to afford defendant a further opportunity to consult with counsel and, during the plea allocution conducted later that day, defendant was fully advised of, and understood, the consequences of his plea. Accordingly, we conclude that defendant's plea was knowing, voluntary and intelligent, and represents a voluntary and intelligent choice among the alternative courses of action open to the defendant (see People v Conceicao, 26 NY3d 375 [2015]). Contrary to defendant's present claim, his utterances, viewed in their entirety, did not engender significant doubt regarding the voluntariness of the plea to require the court to conduct a further inquiry (see People v Toxey, 86 NY2d 725, 726 [1995]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.