People v Barry
2017 NY Slip Op 03909 [150 AD3d 516]
May 16, 2017
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, June 28, 2017


[*1]
 The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Hamadou Barry, Appellant.

Galluzzo & Arnone LLP, New York (Matthew Galluzzo of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Julia P. Cohen of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ruth Pickholz, J.), rendered September 10, 2015, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of forcible touching, and sentencing him to a term of one year, unanimously affirmed.

The record supports the court's determination that, notwithstanding an unduly suggestive lineup, the victim had an independent source for an in-court identification of defendant (see Neil v Biggers, 409 US 188, 199-200 [1972]; People v Williams, 222 AD2d 149, 153 [1st Dept 1996], lv denied 88 NY2d 1072 [1996]). The victim recognized defendant as someone she had encountered numerous times in the area of her work over the course of approximately two years, and she had ample opportunity to view her assailant during the crime, for a period of minutes under good lighting conditions. Concur—Friedman, J.P., Richter, Moskowitz, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.