People v Goldman
2017 NY Slip Op 08189 [155 AD3d 506]
November 21, 2017
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, January 3, 2018


[*1]
 The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Reginald Goldman, Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Molly Ryan of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Jordan K. Hummel of counsel), for respondent.

Judgments of resentence, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ralph Fabrizio, J.), rendered March 28, 2016, resentencing defendant to an aggregate term of six years, unanimously affirmed.

In this resentencing pursuant to People v Rudolph (21 NY3d 497 [2013]), the court providently exercised its discretion in denying youthful offender treatment. The seriousness of defendant's multiple violent crimes, including, among other things, shooting two victims in the back, outweighed the allegedly mitigating factors asserted by defendant. Concur—Acosta, P.J., Tom, Webber, Gesmer and Singh, JJ.